Whoshouldqualifyforminimumwageprotections,sickleaveoranyoftheotherbenefitstypicallygivenemployees? alformia'sstateLegislatureisreopeningthathigh-stakes,decades-longdebate,asitpreparestovoteonaproposalthatwouldgivehundredsofthousandsofcontractworkers,suchasdriversofridehalingcompanies,newbenefitsbylegallyrelassfyigthemasemployees.Ifitpasses,thestate'snarrowerdefinitionof"contractor"wouldtriggerahostofotherchangesforcompaniesthatwouldthenhavetopayforSocialSecurity,workers'compensationandunemploymentinsurance.Largeemployerswouldalsohavetopayforhealthinsurance.Thiswouldbeasignificantdevelopmentinworkplacelawandcouldeventuallyhaveimplicationsforworkersandcompaniesacrossthecountry. Theproposedchangeisofkeeninteresttoarapidlygrowingpopulationofcontractorslike LeonardoDiaz.Formostofthepast4years,hehasmadeadecentlivingworking40to50hoursaweekdrivingfortheride-hailingcompanies."Iloveinteractingwithpeople,"saysthefatheroffour,wholivesinLosAngeles.Butmorerecently,Diazhassouredonhisjob.Hesaysthatbothride-halingcompaniescuthisshareofpayments,reducinghistakehomepaytoonly$9anhour,aftertakingthecostofgas,insuranceandcarrepairsintoaccount.Buthesaysthebiggerproblemisthatheistiredofworkingasacontractorandmissesemployeehealthandpaidleavebenefitsheusedtorecivewhenheworkedasavalet."Wedon'tgetanyholidaypay,"Diazsays. "Ifwegetsick,youknow,nobody'sgoingtopayforourdoctors,"ContractorslikeDiazmakeupafast-growingpartoftheworkforce.AndanycompanyinCaliforniausingthemcouldbeaffected. Theimpactofthenewlawwouldreverberatebeyondthestate. "EveryoneislookingtoCaliforniarightnowandthey'reallfollowingitwithbatedbreathbecausetheyrecognizethatlikelywhateverhappensinCaliforniaisgoingtosweepacrossthecountry,"saysMoniqueNgo-Bonnici,anattorneyinCalifornia.TheproposalexpandsonalandmarkCaliforniaSupremeCourtrulinglastyearthatextendedwageprotectionstomoreworkersandnarrowedthedefinitionof"independentcontractor."The.legislativeproposalexpandsonthatrulingandwouldgiveworkersbenefitslikepaidsickleaveandprotectionsunderanti-discriminationlaws.Ngo-Bonniciarguesthatthe,Californiaproposalwouldputbigconstraintsonworkersandcompaniesalike.Speically,itwouldmeanmoreworkerswillbeputonshifts,whichincertainmunicipalitiesmustbescheduledweeksinadvance.---givingworkersfarlessflexibiliy,shesays. Oneride-hailingcompanyconfirmsitwouldhavetorevampitsoperationsinthestatedriversareredassifiedasemployees."Wewouldneedfarfewerdriversthanwecurrentlyhave."saysAdrianDurbin,acompanyspokesman.Andthosethatremainedwouldhaveamuchmorerigidworkschedule.DurbinsaysthoseBigcompaniespushedCalifornialawmakersforamiddlegroundthatwouldgrantindependentcontractorsanarrowersetofbenefits,likeminimumwageguarantees,withoutmakingthemullledgedemployees. WhichofthefollowingisNOTincludedinthelegislativeproposal?
A.Companies to pay for workers' compensation. B.Companies to pay for workens' insurance. C.Companies to raise the minimum wage. D.Companies to provide holiday pay.正确答案D
