A common argument against cars is that theypollute the environment and thus, are undesirable. (63) Wh

欢迎免费使用小程序搜题/刷题/查看解析,提升学历,成考自考报名,论文代写、论文查重请加客服微信skr-web

A common argument against cars is that theypollute the environment and thus, are undesirable. (63) While this is true,the automobile must be removed from urban planning not only due to pollutionbut also because of its unsustainable nature. Cars—and the type of citythat is planned around them—use considerable resources and space that will notbe available in the future. Oil reserves are dwindling and will disappearwithin the next century. (64) Although it is possible for alternative fuelsources to be developed, these will nonetheless require considerable energyuse. Furthermore, many resources are consumed in the production of cars.(65) In a world with a constantly increasing population, the manufacture ofnew cars is not something that can be sustained and provided to all the peopleof the world. (66) Not only does the production and operation of carsdrain society, but the attitude associated with the automobile endangers thefuture. (67) It is not advantageous for individuals to drive everywherebecause, as the population increases, it will lead to incredible congestionwithin urban areas. It is certainly a drain on both time andresources,which can be avoided with proper planning for the future.

(From Communities for Future Generations in the US)

 
请翻译划线句子

63.尽管这是事实,但是城市规划之所以要排斥小轿车不仅是因为污染,而且还因为在城市中小轿车无法持续发展
64.尽管我们可能开发出替代的燃料,然而这会耗费大量能源。
65.在这个人口持续增长的世界上,制造新汽车是一个不可持续的产业,而且我们也不能为世界上所有的人提供汽车
66.汽车的生产和使用不仅耗尽了社会资源,而且与使用汽车相关的态度还威胁到人类的未来。
67.人们到哪里都开车出行并无优势,因为随着人口的增长,城市内部将出现令人难以置信的交通拥堵

访客
邮箱
网址

通用的占位符缩略图

人工智能机器人,扫码免费帮你完成工作


  • 自动写文案
  • 自动写小说
  • 马上扫码让Ai帮你完成工作
通用的占位符缩略图

人工智能机器人,扫码免费帮你完成工作

  • 自动写论文
  • 自动写软件
  • 我不是人,但是我比人更聪明,我是强大的Ai
Top